Case 1305061/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Rogers v Inspired Thinking Group (ITG) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1305061/2020
- Decision date
- 23 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Meichen
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Rogers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Meichen sitting alone in Birmingham on 23 October 2020. The claimant, Mr D Rogers, confirmed that his only claim was disability discrimination against Inspired Thinking Group (ITG) Ltd.
The tribunal decided that the claim was out of time. It also held that it was not just and equitable to extend time, and therefore concluded that it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim.
The claim was dismissed. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | At the preliminary hearing, the claimant confirmed that he had claimed disability discrimination only. The tribunal held that the claim was out of time, that it was not just and equitable to extend time, that it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim, and dismissed it. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable extension of time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.