Case 1305090/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Susak, Counsel For the v Miss S Murphy, Solicitor — 2020
- Case reference
- 1305090/2018
- Decision date
- 28 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hughes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Susak, Counsel For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Hughes in Birmingham on 28 January 2020. The claimant, represented by Mr S Susak, applied to amend the Claim Form. The tribunal allowed that application and directed that the further and better particulars of claim be treated as the grounds of complaint.
By consent, the case was combined with cases 1305087/18 Mr T Adegbayi v Fine Futures Ltd and 3334411/18 Mrs D Last v Fine Futures Ltd because of significant overlap in the eventual and factual matrix. The written record contains no substantive determination of liability, no findings on the underlying complaints, and no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary-hearing decision only. The judgment allowed an application to amend the Claim Form and directed that the further and better particulars of claim stand as the grounds of complaint. No substantive liability finding was made in this record. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.