Case 1305095/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Singh v Lionhart Security Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1305095/2021
- Decision date
- 20 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Platt Representation
- Venue
- By CVP at Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Singh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 12 October 2022, Employment Judge Platt recorded that Lionhart Security Services Limited accepted that it had made unlawful deductions from Mr H Singh's wages. The Tribunal therefore ordered the Respondent to pay the gross sum of £1,539.00, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance, in respect of the amount unlawfully deducted.
The Respondent's application for an extension of time to file its response succeeded, so the response was accepted. Its application to strike out the Claimant's remaining claims, said to be out of time or insufficiently pleaded, failed and was dismissed. The judgment does not determine the merits of those remaining claims, which therefore remained unresolved in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Respondent accepted that it had made unlawful deductions from the Claimant's wages. The Tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,539.00, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,539 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,539
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.