Case 1305101/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs B Walker v Melody Lee Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1305101/2021
- Decision date
- 7 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fitzgerald Representation
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs B Walker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs B Walker brought claims against Melody Lee Limited for unlawful deduction from wages and what the judgment describes as an 'unnotified deduction of wages'. The case was heard by Employment Judge Fitzgerald at Midlands West Employment Tribunal by video on 7 June 2022.
The Tribunal upheld both claims. It ordered the Respondent to repay the Claimant £100.80 net. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested, so the judgment contains no further findings on the underlying facts or legal reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal recorded that the Claimant’s claim for unlawful deduction from wages was successful. The judgment does not set out any separate reasoning beyond the formal outcome. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The Tribunal also recorded success for a claim described as an 'unnotified deduction of wages'. The judgment does not identify a separate statutory basis for this wording, so it is classified as other. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £101
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.