Case 1305124/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss. R. Senior, Counsel v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1305124/2021
- Decision date
- 17 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon Members
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mr R.S. Virdee, Mrs. E. Shenton
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Miss. R. Senior, Counsel
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Birmingham before Employment Judge Wedderspoon with members Mr R.S. Virdee and Mrs E. Shenton, held that the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim was well founded and succeeded. It found that if the respondent had obtained an occupational health report and consulted the claimant, he would have been fairly dismissed by 17 August 2021, namely by no later than six weeks after 5 July 2021. The tribunal made no deduction for contributory fault.
The claim of discrimination arising from disability also succeeded. The tribunal found that the respondent would have been justified in dismissing the claimant by 17 August 2021, again by no later than six weeks after 5 July 2021. By contrast, the claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments was dismissed as not well founded.
On remedy, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £11,424. It also awarded £1,712.52 inclusive of interest for injury to feelings, and recorded a 25% deduction to the compensatory award for failure to appeal the dismissal decision. Separate sums were awarded for holiday pay of £126.23, sick pay of £43.36, pension payment of £81.90, and loss of statutory rights of £375, producing a total award including interest of £13,763.01. The breach of contract claim and the claim for failing to provide terms and conditions were both dismissed on withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim succeeded. The tribunal awarded a basic award of £11,424. | Upheld | — | £11,424 |
| Disability discrimination | The claim of discrimination arising from disability succeeded. The tribunal awarded £1,712.52 inclusive of interest for injury to feelings. | Upheld | Disability | £1,713 |
| Disability discrimination | The failure to make reasonable adjustments claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The claim for failing to provide terms and conditions was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,763
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £11,424
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,339
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.