Case 1305147/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Bromage v BW Gardening Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1305147/2023
- Decision date
- 23 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Wright Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Bromage
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered a holiday pay complaint brought by Mr Bromage against BW Gardening Limited (in voluntary liquidation). The respondent did not attend the CVP hearing on 23 November 2023. The judgment states that the complaint in respect of holiday pay was well-founded because the respondent failed to pay the claimant for 27.7 hours of holiday accrued but untaken on the date his employment ended.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mr Bromage £263.15 gross. The written record notes that this sum was gross and that the claimant was responsible for any tax or national insurance. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons were provided with the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the holiday pay complaint well-founded because the respondent had failed to pay the claimant for 27.7 hours of holiday accrued but untaken when employment ended. | Upheld | — | £263 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £263
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.