Case 1305159/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Shaw, lay representative v Ms P Lawton, trustee — 2020
- Case reference
- 1305159/2020
- Decision date
- 15 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Shaw, lay representative
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a Birmingham CVP hearing on 15 October 2020 before Employment Judge Broughton, the tribunal considered the claimant's complaint against Animal Lifeline. The claimant was represented by Ms J Shaw and the respondent by Ms P Lawton, trustee.
The tribunal's judgment records that the claimant had suffered an unlawful deduction from his wages in relation to his lunch hours. That claim was upheld. No other substantive claim outcome is recorded in the written judgment provided.
The tribunal did not quantify remedy at that hearing. Instead, it directed the parties to have 28 days to resolve the claims and/or agree remedy, failing which the matter would be listed for a 90-minute CVP hearing before Employment Judge Broughton as soon as possible thereafter.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claimant had suffered an unlawful deduction from wages in relation to his lunch hours. The judgment did not record a final remedy; the parties were given 28 days to resolve the claims and/or agree remedy, failing which a 90-minute CVP hearing would be listed. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.