Case 1305174/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Krupski v Brush Strokes Road Sweepers Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1305174/2020
- Decision date
- 19 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Krupski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal made a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mr L Krupski against Brush Strokes Road Sweepers Limited. It found that he was entitled to a gross sum of £936 for unpaid wages, calculated by reference to 13 shifts worked at 8 hours each and £9 per hour. The judgment records that liability for tax lies with the claimant.
The tribunal did not award any sums for Universal Credit loans or for compensation for hardship, fraudulent activity, stress, or unpaid bills. It said those matters fell outside the jurisdiction of the Employment Tribunal. No separate award structure beyond the gross wage sum is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal awarded a gross sum of £936 for unpaid wages for 13 shifts worked, each lasting 8 hours at £9 per hour. The judgment says liability for tax lies with the claimant. | Upheld | — | £936 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £936
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.