Case 1305184/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Mr. Counsel — 2022
- Case reference
- 1305184/2021
- Decision date
- 25 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon Tribunal
- Venue
- Birmingham via CVP
- Panel members
- Ms. Forrest, Ms. M. Howard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this decision in Mr. Iyieke v Bearing Point Limited, heard at Birmingham via CVP on 25 November 2022 before Employment Judge Wedderspoon with Tribunal Members Ms. Forrest and Ms. M. Howard, the tribunal recorded procedural orders rather than a substantive merits judgment. The text identifies the parties and the hearing panel but does not set out any findings on the underlying pleaded employment claims.
The tribunal made an award of costs against the claimant for the benefit of the respondent, with the amount to be assessed on the papers. It also refused the claimant's application for the hearing to be electronically recorded and refused the application for a stay in the proceedings pending an appeal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This judgment does not record any substantive liability finding or claim outcome. It records only procedural orders and a costs award, with the amount to be assessed on the papers. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.