Case 1305239/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Popescu (1) Mr I C Sandu (2) Mrs I Ungureanu (3) Mr A Ungureanu (4) v Great British Inns Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1305239/2020
- Decision date
- 11 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge MURDIN
- Venue
- Birmingham ET
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Popescu (1) Mr I C Sandu (2) Mrs I Ungureanu (3) Mr A Ungureanu (4)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Murdin sat alone at Birmingham Employment Tribunal on 11 August 2022. The respondent did not attend. The judgment was made in favour of each of the four claimants, and the order was expressed as net sums due in respect of accrued but untaken holiday on termination of employment.
The tribunal ordered Great British Inns Ltd to pay Miss A Popescu £1,345.96, Mr I C Sandu £2,073.60, Mrs I Ungureanu £82.10, and Mr A Ungureanu £1,300. The judgment directed that those sums be paid by 4 pm on 25 August 2022. No separate reasoning, legal test, or additional remedy was set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Net sum awarded in respect of accrued but untaken holiday upon termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £1,346 |
| Holiday pay | Net sum awarded in respect of accrued but untaken holiday upon termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £2,074 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to claim number 305241/2020 in the text; context indicates this was claim 1305241/2020. Net sum awarded in respect of accrued but untaken holiday upon termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £82 |
| Holiday pay | Net sum awarded in respect of accrued but untaken holiday upon termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £1,300 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,802
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.