Case 1305250/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Kelly v J’adore Beaute Limited Heard: by CVP in Birmingham — 2023
- Case reference
- 1305250/2021
- Decision date
- 20 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Codd Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Kelly
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Miss L Kelly was unfairly dismissed for an automatically unfair reason pursuant to s.103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment records a compensatory award of £280.96 in her favour.
The tribunal also ordered the respondent to pay £91.80 in respect of accrued but unpaid annual leave. No basic award, injury to feelings award, or interest is recorded in the extracted judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the claimant was unfairly dismissed for an automatically unfair reason pursuant to s.103A Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £281 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal also ordered payment for accrued but unpaid annual leave. | Upheld | — | £92 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £373
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £281
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.103A Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.