Case 1305256/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 1305256/2023
- Decision date
- 5 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry Appearances
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Perry at Centre City Tower, Birmingham on 5 June 2024. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel. The written judgment records that the hearing was conducted in public via the Cloud video platform.
The Tribunal decided that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claimant's claim and struck it out. No further substantive findings on the merits of the claim are recorded in the written decision.
The respondent confirmed that no application for costs would be pursued. The judgment also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the Tribunal's rules.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written record states only that the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear the claimant's claim and that it was struck out. The underlying cause of action is not identified in the extracted judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.