Case 1305266/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Linda Smith v Trackrok Limited (formerly SCUK Technical Services Ltd) — 2022
- Case reference
- 1305266/2021
- Decision date
- 3 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hena Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Linda Smith
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place by CVP in Birmingham on 3 October 2022 before Employment Judge Hena. The respondent did not attend. The tribunal proceeded in absence under Rule 47 after finding that the respondent had notice of the hearing and had said in correspondence on 28 and 29 September 2022 that it knew of the hearing and had been advised by insolvency practitioners not to attend. The tribunal also noted the respondent's letter saying the company was being wound up, but found that it remained an active company on the hearing date.
On liability, the tribunal applied s.98(1) and (2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and found that the claimant's dismissal was not by reason of redundancy and instead was for a reason that was not potentially fair. The judgment records that the reason advanced in the respondent's ET3 was the belief that the claimant's role was a sham role. The unfair dismissal claim therefore succeeded.
On remedy, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £5,685.32. The judgment's calculation included a basic award of £1,208.40, a compensatory award of £300 for loss of statutory rights, two weeks' notice pay of £805.60, a 15% ACAS uplift, and holiday pay of £3,205.48 for 39.79 days at £80.56.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal was not by reason of redundancy and that the respondent's ET3 said the claimant's role was a sham role. The remedy section records a basic award of £1,208.40 and a compensatory award of £300, with additional notice pay, ACAS uplift and holiday pay included in the overall calculation. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Awarded as holiday pay calculated at 39.79 days x £80.56. | Upheld | — | £3,205 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,685
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,208
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £300
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- s.98(1) and (2) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.