Case 1305267/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Tribunal upholds unlawful-deduction-from-wages and holiday-pay claims against Executive Care Agency
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,281.25. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement.
- Case reference
- 1305267/2020
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Woffenden
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Butler
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Woffenden determined two money claims brought by Mrs L Butler against Executive Care Agency. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,281.25.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £450, calculated in the judgment as 4.5 days at £100 per day, using an 8-hour day at £12.50 an hour. No separate award for interest, injury to feelings, or other compensation is recorded in the judgment text. The total monetary award on the face of the judgment is £1,731.25.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,281.25. | Upheld | — | £1,281 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that holiday entitlement had not been paid and ordered £450, described as 4.5 days at £100 per day (8 hours a day at £12.50 an hour). | Upheld | — | £450 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,731
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.