Case 1305293/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Shimmans v Collins & Kimpton Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1305293/2021
- Decision date
- 9 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kelly
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Shimmans
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge Kelly on 9 August 2022, found that Collins & Kimpton Limited had made a deduction from Miss H Shimmans's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £272.18, stated to comprise £226.82 with a 20% uplift for failure to follow a statutory code of practice.
The tribunal also upheld the holiday pay claim and ordered payment of £96.65, stated to comprise £80.54 with a 20% uplift for failure to follow a statutory code of practice. No other claims, findings, or remedy components are recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found a deduction from wages and ordered payment of £272.18, described as £226.82 plus a 20% uplift for failure to follow a statutory code of practice. | Upheld | — | £272 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay was awarded in the sum of £96.65, described as £80.54 plus a 20% uplift for failure to follow a statutory code of practice. | Upheld | — | £97 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £369
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.