Case 1305309/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Cody Davies v Certs Assured Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1305309/2023
- Decision date
- 30 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gidney Appearances
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Cody Davies
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing at Midlands West Employment Tribunal on 30 September 2024 before Employment Judge Gidney. The Claimant, Cody Davies, was represented by Gabrielle Morris and the Respondent, Certs Assured Ltd, by Zara Hussain.
The judgment records two disability discrimination claims under the Equality Act 2010. The first was a claim of discrimination arising from disability under s15 EqA 2010. The second was a claim of direct discrimination under s13 EqA 2010.
Both claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. The judgment does not record any substantive liability findings beyond the fact of withdrawal and dismissal, and it does not record any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim under s15 Equality Act 2010 (discrimination arising from disability) dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim under s13 Equality Act 2010 (direct discrimination) dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.