Case 1305310/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Hegarty v Staff Direct 4 U Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1305310/2020
- Decision date
- 11 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Algazy QC
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Hegarty
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Birmingham on 11 November 2020 before Employment Judge Algazy QC. The claimant, Ms J Hegarty, did not attend. For the respondent, Staff Direct 4 U Ltd, Mr James Gunnion attended as consultant.
The tribunal recorded that it had made practicable enquiries, had attempted to contact the claimant by email because no telephone number was available, and had considered the information available to it, including the claimant’s apparent failure to pursue the claim or comply with tribunal orders. On the respondent’s application, the tribunal dismissed the claim for non-attendance under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
Oral reasons were given on 11 November 2020. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on liability or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment does not state the substantive claim type; this classification follows the case listing information provided alongside the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.