Case 1305361/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In Person (Assisted by Mr A Oakey – Claimant’s Husband) For the v Mr M Cameron (Consultant) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1305361/2023
- Decision date
- 19 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person (Assisted by Mr A Oakey – Claimant’s Husband) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing at Birmingham on 19 August 2024 before Employment Judge Gaskell. The tribunal recorded that, pursuant to Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2023, the entirety of the claimant's claims against each respondent were struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success.
The written record does not identify the individual allegations in detail, but the case context identifies disability discrimination and working time claims. The decision does not record any substantive findings on liability beyond the strike-out order, and no remedy was awarded.
The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. On the written record provided, the operative outcome is that all claims were struck out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written record does not set out the underlying disability discrimination allegations; the classification follows the case context listing category and the tribunal's order striking out the entirety of the claimant's claims against both respondents. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Working time regulations | The written record does not set out the underlying working time allegations; the classification follows the case context listing category and the tribunal's order striking out the entirety of the claimant's claims against both respondents. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2023
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.