Case 1305400/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms S Spencer (the respondent's accountant) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1305400/2020
- Decision date
- 9 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe final merits hearing took place remotely on 9 September 2020 before Employment Judge Perry sitting alone. By consent, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to compensate the claimant for holiday leave that had accrued at the termination of his employment. The respondent was ordered to pay £743.60 gross in respect of that accrued leave entitlement.
The judgment also records that the parties had agreed terms of settlement in relation to the claimant’s remaining complaints. Those complaints were stayed until 4:00pm on 7 October 2020 so that the settlement terms could be implemented, and the tribunal recorded that unless either party applied before the end of the stay, the remaining claims would be dismissed on withdrawal with no order as to costs. Written reasons were not provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered payment of £743.60 gross for accrued holiday leave outstanding at termination. The remaining complaints were dealt with separately by consent and were not finally determined in this judgment. | Upheld | — | £744 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £744
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.