Mrs K Sharp v Hoople Limited — 2025

Case reference: 1305439/2024
Decision date: 7 March 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Codd Appearances

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs K Sharp

Respondent

Hoople Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This written record concerns two applications rather than a substantive liability judgment. Mrs K Sharp applied to strike out the respondent's response and to amend her claim. Employment Judge Codd, sitting at Birmingham by CVP on 7 March 2025, held that both applications were not well founded and dismissed them.

The judgment does not set out the tribunal's reasons in writing. It records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note at the end of the decision.

No monetary award is recorded in this decision, and no substantive claim outcome is determined on the face of the written record beyond dismissal of the two applications.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The claimant's application for amendment of her claim was found not well founded and was dismissed.	Dismissed	—	—
Other	The claimant's application for strike out of the response was found not well founded and was dismissed.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.