Case 1305448/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Laura O’Donnell v B&M Retail Limited RECORD OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2024
- Case reference
- 1305448/2024
- Decision date
- 7 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murdin Appearances
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Laura O’Donnell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a record of a preliminary hearing heard by Employment Judge Murdin via CVP on 7 October 2024. The claimant was Miss Laura O’Donnell and the respondent was B&M Retail Limited.
The only claim recorded in the judgment was unfair dismissal. The tribunal ordered that claim struck out pursuant to Rule 37(1)(c) and/or Rule 37(1)(d) of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No remedy was awarded and the judgment does not record any compensatory, basic, or total award. The text provided contains no further findings of fact or legal reasoning beyond the strike-out decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out at a preliminary hearing pursuant to Rule 37(1)(c) and/or Rule 37(1)(d) of Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(c) and/or Rule 37(1)(d) of Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.