Case 1305499/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G Tak v Carillion Construction Services (In Compulsory Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1305499/2018
- Decision date
- 19 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs G Tak
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was stayed from the time it was presented in 2018 because the respondent was in compulsory liquidation. The tribunal said the stay could not be lifted without permission from the High Court.
After the claimant responded to a strike-out warning by email on 18 January 2024, the tribunal gave her a further opportunity by letter dated 30 January 2024 to apply to the High Court for permission to continue. She was told that if no application had been made by the end of April 2024 the claim might be struck out.
The claimant did not make the required application. The tribunal found that the claim had therefore not been actively pursued and struck it out. The judgment records that the claim was at an end.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive legal cause of action; it records only that the claim had been stayed since 2018 because the respondent was in compulsory liquidation and was struck out after the claimant did not apply to the High Court for permission to lift the stay. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.