Case 1305521/2022 · Employment Tribunal
in Person For the v Mr I Lovejoy, Legal Executive — 2022
- Case reference
- 1305521/2022
- Decision date
- 2 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Algazy QC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 2 November 2022 before Employment Judge Algazy KC, the tribunal gave oral reasons and held that the claims were not well founded. The judgment states that the claims were dismissed because there were no claims being pursued that were within the jurisdiction of the Employment Tribunal. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr I. Lovejoy, Legal Executive.
No specific claim type is identified in the written judgment, and no remedy was awarded. The tribunal recorded that written reasons would not be produced unless requested under Rule 62(3) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify any specific pleaded claim type; it states that the claims were not well founded and were dismissed because there were no claims being pursued that were within the jurisdiction of the Employment Tribunal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.