Case 1305536/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For v Mr TRG Wilkes — 2020
- Case reference
- 1305536/2020
- Decision date
- 6 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gaskell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that on or about 16 January 2020 the claimant was dismissed by the respondent by reason of redundancy. It held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment and awarded £5,546.25 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found the claimant’s claim for unpaid holiday pay to be well-founded and made an award of £765 net. It further found the claim for unpaid notice pay to be well-founded and awarded £2,295 net on that claim.
The judgment records a total award of £8,606.25. The written record notes that the redundancy sum at paragraph 2 was calculated net of income tax and national insurance contributions, with the respondent to make the corresponding payment to HMRC on payment of the award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy on or about 16 January 2020 and awarded a redundancy payment in this sum. | Upheld | — | £5,546 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment describes this as an award for unpaid holiday pay, expressed as a net sum. | Upheld | — | £765 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this as an award for unpaid notice pay, expressed as a net sum. | Upheld | — | £2,295 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,606
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.