Case 1305544/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Lovell v 21st Century Leisure Services Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 1305544/2023
- Decision date
- 23 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Wright
Parties
3 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the Secretary of State conceded Mr N Lovell was an employee of the first respondent at the relevant time. It also records that payments would be made in respect of arrears of pay, redundancy pay, holiday pay pro-rated for the holiday year, and notice pay.
The parties agreed terms of settlement and, by consent, all proceedings were stayed until 4pm on 13 June 2024. The order stated that, without further order, the proceedings would then be dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant unless before that time either party notified the Tribunal that it did not wish the judgment to take effect. The written judgment does not quantify any award or contain a merits determination on the underlying claims.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the Secretary of State confirmed payments would be made in respect of arrears of pay. The proceedings were stayed by consent; no sum is quantified in the written judgment. | Settled | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment records that the Secretary of State confirmed payments would be made in respect of redundancy pay. The proceedings were stayed by consent; no sum is quantified in the written judgment. | Settled | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records that the Secretary of State confirmed payments would be made in respect of holiday pay, pro-rated for the holiday year. The proceedings were stayed by consent; no sum is quantified in the written judgment. | Settled | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the Secretary of State confirmed payments would be made in respect of notice pay. The proceedings were stayed by consent; no sum is quantified in the written judgment. | Settled | — | — |
| Other | The judgment records the Secretary of State's concession that the claimant was an employee of the first respondent at the relevant time. No separate merits determination is set out for the insolvency-related aspect, and the proceedings were stayed by consent. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.