Case 1305551/2018 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 1305551/2018
- Decision date
- 21 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dean
Parties
1 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr G Osborne brought a complaint against Central Midlands Laboratories Ltd and Testing & Consultancy Services Midlands Ltd. At the hearing on 21 November 2019, Employment Judge Dean recorded that the claimant appeared in person, the first respondent was represented by Mr Swanson, and the second respondent did not attend.
The tribunal decided that it did not have jurisdiction to entertain the claimant's complaint against either named respondent. On that basis, the complaint was dismissed. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written judgment does not identify the substantive complaint in the decision text; the gov.uk listing for the case identifies it as an unlawful deduction from wages matter. The tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to entertain the claimant's complaint against either named respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.