Case 1305552/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Toner (Solicitor) For the First v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1305552/2022
- Decision date
- 3 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gilroy KC
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms N Toner (Solicitor) For the First
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal referred to an earlier consent judgment dated 31 May 2022, which had made a protective award to the claimants named in the schedule to that judgment. The claimant then issued enforcement proceedings under s.192 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and s.186 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The Tribunal recorded confirmation on behalf of the joint liquidator of Tonik Energy Limited that entitlement to a protective award was not disputed, while the liquidator reserved position on the amount of outstanding remuneration pending insolvency proof of debt and dividend matters. The Tribunal was satisfied, by reference to Annexe A, that each claimant was entitled to the protective award amount shown, had received partial payment from the Redundancy Payments Service, and had the outstanding balance shown as Remaining PA.
For case 1305552/2022, Suman Aamer was listed with a Total PA of £4,932.58, Gross paid by RPS of £3,068.48, and Remaining PA of £1,864.10. The judgment ordered the First Respondent to pay the Remaining PA amount to each claimant named in Annexe A.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award enforcement proceedings under s.192 TULRCA 1992 and s.186 ERA 1996. The locked taxonomy has no specific protective award category, so classified as other. | Upheld | — | £1,864 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,864
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.192 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- s.186 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.