Case 1305637/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Hartland v Hills Site Services Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1305637/2022
- Decision date
- 15 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Knowles Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Hartland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Hartland brought a claim against Hills Site Services Ltd for unlawful deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 in respect of work done between 11 and 15 July 2022. The respondent did not attend and was not represented.
The tribunal found the wage deduction claim well-founded and succeeded. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £840 gross. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim concerned unpaid wages for work done between 11 and 15 July 2022. The tribunal found the claim well-founded under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered payment of £840 gross. | Upheld | — | £840 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £840
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.