Case 1305645/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Ms V Martin — 2023
- Case reference
- 1305645/2023
- Decision date
- 7 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Noons Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms M Taylor, was employed by the respondent, Ms V Martin, from 22 December 2021 until 7 May 2023. The tribunal heard the case by CVP on 15 May 2024, but neither party attended. The tribunal therefore decided the case on the papers, consisting of the ET1 and ET3, and without hearing evidence or submissions.
The only claim identified in the reasons was a claim for accrued but unpaid annual leave. The respondent said that all outstanding leave had been paid. The tribunal noted that it was for the claimant to set out how much untaken annual leave she said she was owed, and found that she had not done so.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the claimant's claim for unpaid annual leave failed and dismissed it. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The claimant brought a claim for accrued but unpaid annual leave. The tribunal found she had not set out how much untaken annual leave she said was owed, and dismissed the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.