Case 1305693/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J DaleGrieh v App Tech Development Ltd (Metawin) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1305693/2024
- Decision date
- 20 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Edmonds Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J DaleGrieh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a hearing on 20 June 2024 at Birmingham before Employment Judge Edmonds, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr S Forshaw KC. The judgment is recorded as an application for interim relief in case 1305693/2024.
The tribunal refused the claimant's application for interim relief and dismissed it. The extracted text does not set out the underlying substantive claim or any detailed findings on the merits.
The written record states that reasons for the decision were given orally at the hearing. It also states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by a party within 14 days of the sending of the written record, and no written reasons are included in the supplied text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Application for interim relief. The tribunal refused the application and dismissed it. The written record states that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days; no further reasons are included in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.