Case 1305697/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Beech v Capital Recruitment Investments Ltd Heard: Midlands West (by Cloud Video Platform) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1305697/2022
- Decision date
- 6 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Power
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Beech
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Power, sitting alone at the Midlands West hearing by Cloud Video Platform on 6 February 2023, found that Mr A Beech's complaint of unlawful deduction from wages was well founded and succeeded. The judgment identified the shortfall as 71 x £3, giving a gross amount of £213 for hours worked.
The tribunal ordered Capital Recruitment Investments Ltd to pay Mr Beech £213, subject to appropriate deductions for tax and national insurance contributions before payment was made. No other claims or heads of remedy are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint well founded and ordered payment of 71 x £3 = £213, described as the shortfall of the gross pay due for hours worked. | Upheld | — | £213 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £213
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £213
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.