Case 1305701/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Justin Mitchell v Avicenna Surgical Limited Heard: by CVP in Birmingham — 2023
- Case reference
- 1305701/2022
- Decision date
- 24 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Codd Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Justin Mitchell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written record records that the respondent unlawfully deducted 17 days' wages and 1.4 days' holiday pay from the claimant's pay. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £5,337.56, with the respondent responsible for PAYE deductions of tax and National Insurance and payment of the net amount to the claimant.
The tribunal also ordered payment of £17.10 in unpaid expenses. All sums were ordered to be paid within 28 days of the order. The document contains no written reasons unless requested within 14 days, so the record sets out the outcome and monetary orders without further factual findings or legal analysis.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that 17 days' wages and 1.4 days' holiday pay had been unlawfully deducted. It ordered payment of the gross sum of £5,337.56, with PAYE deductions for tax and National Insurance to be made by the respondent. | Upheld | — | £5,338 |
| Other | The tribunal also ordered the respondent to pay unpaid expenses of £17.10. | Upheld | — | £17 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,355
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.