Case 1305720/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs W Hancock v D and T Guest Catering Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1305720/2020
- Decision date
- 10 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs W Hancock
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued by Employment Judge Cookson on 10 March 2021. The claimant, Mrs W Hancock, brought claims against D and T Guest Catering Ltd. The tribunal recorded that she had not been paid in full for her entitlement to notice, which it treated as a breach of contract, and ordered the respondent to pay damages of £720 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was owed payment for annual leave that had accrued but had not been taken when her employment ended. It ordered the respondent to pay a further £720 gross for that holiday entitlement. No additional reasoning, legal analysis, or separate remedy components were set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the claimant had not been paid in full for her entitlement to notice and ordered damages in the gross sum of £720. | Upheld | — | £720 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the claimant was owed annual leave that had accrued but had not been taken when employment ended, in the gross sum of £720. | Upheld | — | £720 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,440
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.