Case 1305749/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Turner v Allen Price Carpentry & Joinery Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1305749/2023
- Decision date
- 15 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bansal
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Turner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Bansal sitting alone at Midlands West (by CVP) heard the claim on 4 October 2024 with the claimant in person and the respondent neither attending nor being represented.
The Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant a total of £6,715.66 comprising a basic award of £640 gross, arrears of pay of £3,399.66 net, notice pay of £640 net, loss of statutory rights of £500 net, and £1,536 net for failure to issue a contract of employment.
The respondent was required to account to HMRC for tax and NIC contributions payable. No written reasons accompany this short-form judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Inferred from basic award and loss of statutory rights components; respondent did not attend or represent. Judgment did not separately label the unfair dismissal claim but the remedy components are characteristic of one. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Arrears of pay (net). | Upheld | — | £3,400 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay (net). | Upheld | — | £640 |
| Other | Award of four weeks' pay for failure to issue a written statement of particulars (s.38 Employment Act 2002). | Upheld | — | £1,536 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,716
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £640
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.