Case 1305752/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Griffiths v Abbey Kitchens Ltd (Dissolved) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1305752/2023
- Decision date
- 23 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smart
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Griffiths
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim. It recorded that the respondent company had been dissolved and that the claimant had not successfully applied to have it restored to the Register of Companies. On that basis, the tribunal concluded that the claim could not proceed against the dissolved respondent.
The tribunal also noted that on 15 April 2024 it had given the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason. The judgment therefore states that the claim was struck out. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not separate individual heads of claim, but the case listing identified breach of contract as one of the claims and the tribunal struck out the claim as a whole. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment does not separate individual heads of claim, but the case listing identified redundancy as one of the claims and the tribunal struck out the claim as a whole. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.