Case 1305753/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Randall v Homeserve (Now trading as Emmiera group) — 2025
- Case reference
- 1305753/2023
- Decision date
- 2 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Randall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mr J Randall's claim against Homeserve, now trading as Emmiera Group. It recorded that by letter dated 5 March 2025 the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 25 January 2024 and because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment records no determination of the substantive merits and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type. The claim was struck out because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 25 January 2024 and had not actively pursued the case. The Tribunal also noted a letter dated 5 March 2025 giving the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, but no sufficient representations were made. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.