Case 1305792/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Newton v Rashid Brothers Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1305792/2018
- Decision date
- 31 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lloyd
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Newton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a short rule 52 judgment dated 31 January 2019 in case 1305792/2018. It records that the proceedings brought by Mr W Newton against Rashid Brothers Limited were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.
The judgment contains no findings on the merits of the unfair dismissal or unlawful deduction from wages complaints. It records no remedy, no monetary award, and no further reasoning beyond the dismissal following withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The unfair dismissal claim type is taken from the case listing, as the short judgment does not set out the pleaded particulars. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The unlawful deduction from wages claim type is taken from the case listing, as the short judgment does not set out the pleaded particulars. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.