Case 1305798/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. D. Sumnall v Body Power Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1305798/2020
- Decision date
- 9 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Connolly
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. D. Sumnall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that all claims against Body Power (Holdings) Limited were dismissed upon withdrawal. It also records that the claimant's listed claims against Body Power Limited were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. The decision is dated 9 September 2020 and was issued by Employment Judge Connolly.
The claims specifically listed against Body Power Limited were breach of contract for failure to pay notice pay, breach of contract for failure to account for employer's pension contributions, and breach of s.10 Employment Relations Act 1999. The judgment does not set out any liability findings on those issues because the claims were withdrawn.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment. There is no separate remedy figure for any claim, and the final position is dismissal of the claims following withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | All claims against Body Power (Holdings) Limited were dismissed upon withdrawal; the judgment does not specify the underlying claim types. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract in the form of failure to pay notice pay. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract in the form of a failure to account for employer's pension contributions. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Breach of s.10 Employment Relations Act 1999. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.