Case 1305799/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Anderson v District Enforcement Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1305799/2020
- Decision date
- 8 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Anderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that District Enforcement Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr A Anderson's wages by failing to pay him in lieu of his outstanding holiday on termination of employment. It ordered the respondent to pay £1,672.32.
Mr Anderson's other claims for unlawful deductions from wages and breach of contract were dismissed. The short judgment does not set out any further reasoning or any separate monetary award for those dismissed claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages because the respondent failed to pay the claimant in lieu of outstanding holiday on termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £1,672 |
| Breach of contract | The claimant's other breach of contract claim(s) were not upheld and were dismissed. The judgment gives no further detail. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,672
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.