Case 1305834/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Mr A Tinnion - Counsel (2- 4 December 2020) Mr B Frew – Counsel (1 October 2020_ — 2020
- Case reference
- 1305834/2019
- Decision date
- 4 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self
- Panel members
- Mr S Woodall, Mrs E Shenton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal's remedy judgment records that, following the hearing on 2-4 December 2019, the claimant's race discrimination claims were declared well-founded and succeeded. The judgment on remedy was issued after the later hearing on 1 October 2020 and is limited to the monetary awards flowing from that finding.
The tribunal awarded £9,000 for injury to feelings, £248 for loss of earnings and pension, and £972.89 in interest. The total payable by the respondent to the claimant was £10,220.89. The judgment does not set out any further liability reasoning or additional remedies beyond those figures.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The remedy judgment records that the claimant's race discrimination claims were declared well-founded and succeeded at the liability hearing. It then awarded injury to feelings, loss of earnings and pension, and interest in the amounts set out in the judgment. | Upheld | Race | £10,221 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,221
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £248
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.