Case 1305844/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Arnold v Time Logistics — 2024
- Case reference
- 1305844/2023
- Decision date
- 1 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bennett REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Arnold
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss S Arnold brought a complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages against Time Logistics. Employment Judge Bennett, sitting at Birmingham by CVP on 1 February 2024, found the complaint well-founded. The tribunal held that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions in respect of a £500 ADR training fee, a £1,650 Class 1 training fee, and a £1,000 potential insurance excess.
The tribunal ordered Time Logistics to pay the claimant £3,150, described as the gross sum deducted. The claimant was responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on that sum. Reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were provided in the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of a £500 ADR training fee, a £1,650 Class 1 training fee, and a £1,000 potential insurance excess. | Upheld | — | £3,150 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,150
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.