Case 1305863/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Stanley (counsel) For the v Mr Forrest (HR Adviser) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1305863/2019
- Decision date
- 28 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Members
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mrs K Davis, Mr R White
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Stanley (counsel) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr S Ward had been continuously employed by Federal Mogul Coventry Limited for at least two years ending with the effective date of termination, so his unfair dismissal complaint was accepted for determination. It upheld that complaint and rejected the respondent's case that dismissal for some other substantial reason was well founded.
Although unfair dismissal was established, the tribunal applied Polkey principles and found that, had the respondent put the claimant through a fair process at the material time, he would nevertheless have been fairly dismissed by 14 August 2020. The judgment therefore directed that remedy would need to take that finding into account.
On the Equality Act claims, the tribunal found that the claimant was disabled within the meaning of section 6(1) Equality Act 2010 by reason of his angina. It dismissed the direct discrimination claim under section 13 because the claimant was not dismissed by reason of his disability, and it dismissed the section 15 claim because he was not dismissed by reason of sickness absence arising from his disability. The case was listed to proceed to a separate remedy hearing on 14 October 2020 in respect of the successful unfair dismissal complaint.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant had at least two years' continuous employment and his unfair dismissal complaint succeeded. The tribunal rejected the respondent's assertion that dismissal for some other substantial reason was well founded, but found on Polkey principles that a fair process would still have led to a fair dismissal by 14 August 2020. | Upheld | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed because the tribunal found the claimant was not dismissed by reason of his disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Other | Discrimination arising from disability under section 15 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed because the tribunal found the claimant was not dismissed by reason of his sickness absence arising from his disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Polkey principles
- section 6(1) Equality Act 2010
- section 13 Equality Act 2010
- section 15 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.