Case 1305883/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mukesh Pawar v Jaguar Landrover Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1305883/2023
- Decision date
- 2 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Connolly Members
- Venue
- Midlands West
- Panel members
- Ms D Hill, Ms E Shenton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mukesh Pawar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Midlands West and chaired by Employment Judge J Connolly with lay members Ms D Hill and Ms E Shenton, heard the case between 28 April and 2 May 2025. The claimant was Mukesh Pawar and the respondent was Jaguar Landrover Limited.
In its unanimous judgment, the tribunal dismissed the complaint of direct race discrimination and the complaint of unfair dismissal. The written record states that each complaint was found to be not well-founded.
The record does not set out the oral reasons in writing. It notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's standard notice.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment describes this as a complaint of direct race discrimination and dismisses it as not well-founded. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.