Case 1305887/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Keith Ward v Stonegate Pub Company Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1305887/2019
- Decision date
- 22 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Jones Representation
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Keith Ward
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant resigned after a period in which the respondent sought to transfer him from the Station pub, where he had worked for many years, to another site. He relied on the proposed transfer and a management email of 14 June 2018 as breaches of the implied term of trust and confidence. The respondent relied on the contractual mobility clause and said it was addressing performance concerns at the Station while trying to retain the claimant in employment.
The tribunal found that the respondent had genuine reasons to consider a transfer, including performance issues at the Station, the claimant's ill health, and stresses associated with his role there. It found that the respondent did not act with an intention to cause detriment to the claimant, and that it sought to identify a suitable alternative site, eventually the Crown, with the claimant's agreement.
The tribunal also found that Mr Brown's email was a frank confidential management assessment, not intended for the claimant, and that its purpose was to consider how to address performance concerns while retaining him. When the claimant was upset after receiving the email through his data request, the respondent arranged mediation and Mr Brown apologised for any offence caused. The tribunal concluded there was no breach of contract, so the claimant was not dismissed and the unfair dismissal claim failed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was pleaded as constructive unfair dismissal. The tribunal found that the respondent had not breached the claimant's contract and therefore he was not dismissed but resigned. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 95 ERA 1996
- Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp [1978] ICR 221
- last straw doctrine
- section 98(4) ERA 1996
- implied term of trust and confidence
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.