Case 1305894/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Dr K Howe v Broseley Town Council — 2020
- Case reference
- 1305894/2020
- Decision date
- 12 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dr K Howe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 11 June 2020, Employment Judge Miller heard Dr K Howe's application for interim relief against Broseley Town Council by Skype. The Tribunal held that it appeared likely that, when the underlying complaint was determined, it would find that the reason, or principal reason, for the dismissal was the reason specified in section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Because the Respondent stated that it was unwilling to reinstate or re-engage the Claimant, the Tribunal made an order for the continuation of the Claimant's contract of employment under section 130 Employment Rights Act 1996. The hearing was adjourned to 27 July 2020 at 10am for the final terms of that continuation order to be determined.
For the purposes of the continuation order only, the Tribunal fixed the Claimant's pay at the gross amount of £41,675 per annum, payable monthly in arrears at £3,472.90 per month. It also ordered that the Claimant continue to be a member of the Respondent's pension scheme and that the Respondent continue to pay employer pension contributions commensurate with a salary of £41,675 per annum.
The Tribunal recorded that other terms of the continuation order, including contractual increments, any obligation to pay for training, and the amount of arrears owed for the period from termination, would be determined at the resumed hearing. No final compensation award was made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Interim relief application under s.128 Employment Rights Act 1996 succeeded on the basis that it appeared likely the Tribunal would find the dismissal was for the reason specified in s.103A ERA 1996. This was not a final merits determination of liability. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.128 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.130 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.103A Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.