Case 1305907/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Dr Ahmad, counsel v Miss G carter, solicitor — 2021
- Case reference
- 1305907/2020
- Decision date
- 29 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mr P Wilkinson, Ms R Payne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dr Ahmad, counsel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Birmingham, before Employment Judge Broughton with Mr P Wilkinson and Ms R Payne, held that the claimant's claim for a failure to make reasonable adjustments succeeded. The written record does not set out the underlying facts or the tribunal's detailed reasoning, but it records that the successful claim was for disability discrimination by way of a failure to make reasonable adjustments.
The judgment also records that the claimant's other claims failed and were dismissed. The extracted text does not identify those claims individually, so only the general dismissal can be recorded from the judgment record supplied here.
The tribunal listed a separate remedy hearing for 5 and 6 April 2022 and directed the parties to co-operate and comply with the oral directions already given. No remedy figure is stated in the judgment record provided, and the monetary outcome was left for the later hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant's failure to make reasonable adjustments claim succeeds. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Other | The judgment states that the claimant's other claims fail and are dismissed, but the extracted text does not identify those claims individually. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.