Case 1305909/2020 · Employment Tribunal
No attendance For the v Mr Mc Taggart, solicitor — 2021
- Case reference
- 1305909/2020
- Decision date
- 20 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dean Appearance
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No attendance For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Birmingham by CVP on 20 April 2021, Employment Judge Dean heard from the respondent's solicitor, Mr Mc Taggart; the claimant did not attend. The tribunal considered the claimant's complaints under the Equality Act 2010 and held that they had been presented outside the time limit in s123 Equality Act 2010.
The tribunal also held that it was not just and equitable to extend time to accept the complaints. On that basis, the Employment Tribunal said it did not have jurisdiction to consider the complaints and dismissed them. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written reasons do not spell out the protected characteristic, but the judgment concerns complaints under the Equality Act 2010 and the case listing identifies disability discrimination. The tribunal dismissed the complaints as out of time and declined to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s123 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable extension of time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.