Case 1305952/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Philip v Beacon Communication Services Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 1305952/2019
- Decision date
- 29 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Woffenden
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Philip
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a withdrawal judgment under rule 52. It records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, Mr J Philip, against Beacon Communication Services Ltd. No merits findings, liability findings, or remedy assessment are recorded in the extracted text.
The judgment does not identify any award, and no part of the text allocates compensation or other monetary relief. The case is therefore recorded as withdrawn rather than determined on the substance of the pleaded complaints.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The specific claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category for this case. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The specific claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category for this case. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.