Case 1305968/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Kinsey, claimant’s partner For the v Mr D Howells, director — 2019
- Case reference
- 1305968/2018
- Decision date
- 28 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dimbylow Signed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Kinsey, claimant’s partner For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe matter came before Employment Judge Dimbylow at a preliminary hearing in Birmingham on 26 March 2019. The respondent was represented by Mr D Howells, director, and the claimant by Mr D Kinsey, the claimant’s partner.
By consent, the claimant withdrew five pleaded claims and they were dismissed on withdrawal. Those claims were: breach of contract over failure to give notice or payment in lieu thereof, failure to pay holiday pay, failure to provide payslips, failure to provide written reasons for dismissal, and unlawful deduction from wages for non-payment of SSP.
The judgment records no substantive findings on the merits of those claims and no monetary award. It is limited to recording the dismissal of the claims following withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant, by consent. The pleaded point was failure to give notice or payment in lieu thereof. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant, by consent. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant, by consent. The text describes this as a failure to provide payslips. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant, by consent. The text describes this as a failure to provide written reasons for dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant, by consent. The pleaded point was non-payment of SSP. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.