Case 1305970/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Harrison v Mr M Harris and 2 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 1305970/2020
- Decision date
- 23 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Representation
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mrs K Harrison
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs K Harrison brought an unlawful deduction from wages claim. At the hearing on 23 October 2020 before Employment Judge Miller, the claims against Mr M Harris, Mr K Harris and Ms H Harris were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. Go To The Venue Ltd was added as a respondent by consent.
By consent, Go To The Venue Ltd was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. The tribunal ordered the company to pay unpaid wages of £96.47, said to represent 11.75 hours' work at £8.21 per hour. The judgment records that this was a gross figure and that the claimant would need to account for any tax and national insurance due.
The judgment was given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were provided. The record therefore contains only the consent outcome and the monetary order, without further findings on the underlying factual dispute.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, Go To The Venue Ltd was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and was ordered to pay £96.47, stated to be the gross figure for 11.75 hours' work at £8.21 per hour. The claims against Mr M Harris, Mr K Harris and Ms H Harris were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Upheld | — | £96 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £96
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.